On 10 February 2014 14:00, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > In other words, an automated process can still allow for completely > > inclusive participation. > > > > I never said that it couldn't. I just wanted everyone to recall > that inclusivity is a major aspect of how PMC's (should) operate. >
+1 to that. My view is that each individual PMC that wants to try this type of thing could potentially have their own view of how to achieve inclusivity with such a process and their community. Hence why my feeling is that we should be coming up with a set of things that PMCs must convince the board that they have addressed if they are proposing that they move for a faster cadence of releases. I don't think I have dropped inclusivity from the list I have been probing towards.
