Could you please also take a look? I peeked at commits@ and notifications@ and didn't see it. So maybe I overlooked them or they are not there.
txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 07.12.2024 um 17:05 schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 14:00, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> wrote: >> >> Hi Gilles! >> >>> Maybe something like `isNonIntrospectibleClass()`? >> >> Thanks, that's a really good name! >> I've changed it and pushed it to the PR. >> >> >> Btw, on a more general level. >> It seems that the discussions on the PRs are NOT mirrored on any ASF lists? > > All GH messages should be reflected on mailing lists. > There are GH messages prefixed with PR on issues@commons and > notifications@commons. > If there are any that appear to be missing, please provide details so > Infra can be informed. > >> Nor does the discussions on slack obviously. > Agreed. >> And as you all know: if it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen. >> >> So I would really appreciate if the discussion gets moved over to here. > > Probably a good idea anyway. > >> For example I really cannot understand why we still keep adding --add-opens >> for obviously broken stuff in the main branch instead of trying to discuss >> solutions about how we approach fixing the modularity issues we have >> *together*. My PR is really just a start, and I know that there is still a >> lot to do. The question is more whether it is the right direction or not. >> But we should face it: right now commons-lang3 is not usable for the vast >> majority of projects out there. In the last few months even the oldest >> projects started moving away from Java8. And so should we imo. So please >> folks, stop adding --add-opens all over the place. >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >>> Am 06.12.2024 um 13:59 schrieb Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Le ven. 6 déc. 2024 à 13:41, struberg (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> a >>> écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> struberg commented on PR #1328: >>>> URL: >>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/1328#issuecomment-2523134541 >>>> >>>> Btw, I'm looking for another method name for `isJavaInternalClass()`. It >>>> should rather express that the given clazz cannot be introspected via >>>> reflection. Maybe something like `isNonIntrospectibleClass()`? >>> >>> How about "cannotDoReflection()"? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gilles >>> >>>> [...] >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-h...@commons.apache.org> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@commons.apache.org>
