On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 14:00, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > > Hi Gilles! > > > Maybe something like `isNonIntrospectibleClass()`? > > Thanks, that's a really good name! > I've changed it and pushed it to the PR. > > > Btw, on a more general level. > It seems that the discussions on the PRs are NOT mirrored on any ASF lists?
All GH messages should be reflected on mailing lists. There are GH messages prefixed with PR on issues@commons and notifications@commons. If there are any that appear to be missing, please provide details so Infra can be informed. > Nor does the discussions on slack obviously. Agreed. > And as you all know: if it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen. > > So I would really appreciate if the discussion gets moved over to here. Probably a good idea anyway. > For example I really cannot understand why we still keep adding --add-opens > for obviously broken stuff in the main branch instead of trying to discuss > solutions about how we approach fixing the modularity issues we have > *together*. My PR is really just a start, and I know that there is still a > lot to do. The question is more whether it is the right direction or not. > But we should face it: right now commons-lang3 is not usable for the vast > majority of projects out there. In the last few months even the oldest > projects started moving away from Java8. And so should we imo. So please > folks, stop adding --add-opens all over the place. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 06.12.2024 um 13:59 schrieb Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le ven. 6 déc. 2024 à 13:41, struberg (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> a > > écrit : > >> > >> > >> struberg commented on PR #1328: > >> URL: > >> https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/1328#issuecomment-2523134541 > >> > >> Btw, I'm looking for another method name for `isJavaInternalClass()`. It > >> should rather express that the given clazz cannot be introspected via > >> reflection. Maybe something like `isNonIntrospectibleClass()`? > > > > How about "cannotDoReflection()"? > > > > Regards, > > Gilles > > > >> [...] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
