I would really like to drop support for the oldest versions of SSL, i.e. 1.0.x
These are seriously out of date.
Can we even test them properly?

Unless I hear otherwise, I propose to remove the code next week.

Sebb
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 14:33, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 12:31, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am OK with dropping support for versions below 1.1.1 but it does not
> > seem crucial.
> >
> > I would prefer we do a release for this before we do anything more toward 
> > 3.x.
>
> Not sure I understand what you mean here.
>
> Do you mean we should do a release purely to drop support for versions
> below 1.1?
> Or something else?
>
> Note I am not suggesting dropping support for 1.1.0 yet, but for
> versions before that, i.e. 1.0.x.
>
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 8:49 PM Alex Remily <alex.rem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Good question.  I've asked it myself.  I've been planning on doing an
> > > upgrade to support OpenSSL 3.X.+ that maintains support for 1.1.X.  That
> > > said, it's been at least a year and I haven't gotten around to it, and I'm
> > > not firmly committed to the idea of maintaining backwards compatibility.  
> > > I
> > > think that if we're going to break backwards compatibility with older
> > > versions, the upgrade to 3.X would probably be a good time to do it.  From
> > > what little I've read on the subject, the move from 1.1.1 to 3.X is a
> > > significant change.  In short, I would be in favor of dropping legacy
> > > OpenSSL support in the next commons crypto release.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 9:15 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is quite a lot of Crypto code that depends on the check:
> > > >
> > > > if (dlsym_OpenSSL_version_num() < VERSION_1_1_X)
> > > > where
> > > > VERSION_1_1_X = 0x10100000;
> > > >
> > > > Dropping such support would simplify the code.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any need to continue to support such old versions?
> > > >
> > > > Sebb
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to