Hi All, I am OK with dropping support for versions below 1.1.1 but it does not seem crucial.
I would prefer we do a release for this before we do anything more toward 3.x. Gary On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 8:49 PM Alex Remily <alex.rem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good question. I've asked it myself. I've been planning on doing an > upgrade to support OpenSSL 3.X.+ that maintains support for 1.1.X. That > said, it's been at least a year and I haven't gotten around to it, and I'm > not firmly committed to the idea of maintaining backwards compatibility. I > think that if we're going to break backwards compatibility with older > versions, the upgrade to 3.X would probably be a good time to do it. From > what little I've read on the subject, the move from 1.1.1 to 3.X is a > significant change. In short, I would be in favor of dropping legacy > OpenSSL support in the next commons crypto release. > > Alex > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 9:15 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There is quite a lot of Crypto code that depends on the check: > > > > if (dlsym_OpenSSL_version_num() < VERSION_1_1_X) > > where > > VERSION_1_1_X = 0x10100000; > > > > Dropping such support would simplify the code. > > > > Is there any need to continue to support such old versions? > > > > Sebb > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
