Sounds good to me, so something like v2 will target legacy apps migrating
to jakarta but there will be no v3 so prefer migrating to servlet API - or
your env API.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 11 juil. 2023 à 14:43, Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org> a
écrit :

> > Not sure I get the why, let me summarize:
> >
> > * using [fileupload] in a servlet >= 3 container is conflicting and can
> > easily mess up things
> > * servlet provides [fileupload] api
> > * jetty (since you mentionned it) does not use [fileupload] (
> >
> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-10.0.x/jetty-server/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/server/MultiPartFormInputStream.java#L82
> )
> > but only tomcat does
> >
>
> Pretty sure there are more, see linked JIRA tickets. I'm using it here:
> https://github.com/awslabs/aws-serverless-java-container
>
> Let's move ahead with a release and point out in the docs that from a
> consumer perspective using Servlet API is preferred.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to