Well, it is explicitly in the sense that I would guess that 95% of the test methods in Commons follows that style and that one our documented guidelines is "follow the style of the file you are editing".
Gary On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, 09:16 Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > Le jeu. 17 févr. 2022 à 13:11, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > I have encountered what Sebb mentions more than once, I do like the > "test" > > prefix to make it obvious what is and is not intended to be a test. Same > > reason I like to make test methods public: clear intent. I know Junit 5 > > proposes to change these conventions, the benefit do not outweigh the > > convention we use in Commons today for me. > > OK. > But shouldn't we make that explicit somewhere (or is it already?), in > order to let people know that we considered it and made a choice, > (thus reducing the chance that a contribution is based on another > convention that's perhaps becoming more natural for new developers)? > > Thanks, > Gilles > > > > > [...] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
