Hello.
> [...]
>
> One more practical question: since the tests are not anymore based on the
> methods name and are indicated by annotations now, I've seen tests without
> this "test" in the beginning. Looks like common practice (including it's
> the way it's presented in the JUnit 5 docs). Since I'll dig into all the
> tests, I can make this change as well. I like this style, because it looks
> more "clean" to me. What do you think, should I change the methods names as
> well?
>
Gary notes the practical reason for not mixing types of changes
but you can certainly start a discussion about changing the
convention. I agree that, in
---CUT---
@Test
public void testSomething() {
// ...
}
---CUT---
there is one "test" too many.
Regards,
Gilles
> > [...]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
