IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component that not "common" to "most" Java apps, where I use quotes to understand that YMMV.
Personally, my plate is full with the current slate of components in which I participate. Gary On Wed, May 5, 2021, 09:38 Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> a > écrit : > > > > I apologize. I started another thread regarding the vote before seeing > this. > > No problem. > > > Maybe that will get more attention? > > It doesn't seem so. :-} > > IMHO, valid answers have been given to the statements/questions > from people who didn't vote +1. > The very low turnout makes the arithmetics of the result fairly > subjective... > > The optimistic view is that > 1. most people don't care (that the repository is created), > 2. there is no reason to doubt the infos provided by actual users of > those codes, > 3. there is an embryo of a community (perhaps not viable, but only > the future can tell...),[1] > 4. the same kind of welcoming gestures should apply for the proposed > contributions, as for the attempt to resuscitate "Commons Graph"[2], > even if some of the PMC might arguably prefer another option. > > Regards, > Gilles > > [1] Three Java implementations of the SOFM turned up as the top results > of a web search; none seem to include multi-threading. > [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > On May 2, 2021, at 3:59 PM, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > >> [... Discussion about GA data-structures...] > > > > > > I'd suggest that we finalize the [Vote] before getting into the > > > details... > > > > > > Currently, there have been votes by: > > > Emmanuel Bourg (-1) > > > Sebastian Bazley (-0) > > > Ralph Goers (+0) > > > Paul King (+1) > > > > > > So currently, the discussion should be focused on settling to the > > > issues put forward by the opponents to having this new component: > > > * Problem 1: Functionality should go somewhere else (Emmanuel, Sebb) > > > * Problem 2: Who will contribute? (Ralph) > > > > > > Partial answers have been given. > > > We need more opinions (and votes). > > > > > > Regards, > > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
