Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 02:49, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> a écrit : > > I apologize. I started another thread regarding the vote before seeing this.
No problem. > Maybe that will get more attention? It doesn't seem so. :-} IMHO, valid answers have been given to the statements/questions from people who didn't vote +1. The very low turnout makes the arithmetics of the result fairly subjective... The optimistic view is that 1. most people don't care (that the repository is created), 2. there is no reason to doubt the infos provided by actual users of those codes, 3. there is an embryo of a community (perhaps not viable, but only the future can tell...),[1] 4. the same kind of welcoming gestures should apply for the proposed contributions, as for the attempt to resuscitate "Commons Graph"[2], even if some of the PMC might arguably prefer another option. Regards, Gilles [1] Three Java implementations of the SOFM turned up as the top results of a web search; none seem to include multi-threading. [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git > > Ralph > > > On May 2, 2021, at 3:59 PM, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > >> [... Discussion about GA data-structures...] > > > > I'd suggest that we finalize the [Vote] before getting into the > > details... > > > > Currently, there have been votes by: > > Emmanuel Bourg (-1) > > Sebastian Bazley (-0) > > Ralph Goers (+0) > > Paul King (+1) > > > > So currently, the discussion should be focused on settling to the > > issues put forward by the opponents to having this new component: > > * Problem 1: Functionality should go somewhere else (Emmanuel, Sebb) > > * Problem 2: Who will contribute? (Ralph) > > > > Partial answers have been given. > > We need more opinions (and votes). > > > > Regards, > > Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
