Oh so animal-sniffer is the plugin we use to check this kind of issue?
Thanks, I will learn about it later.

Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 于2020年8月17日周一 下午3:58写道:

> On 16/08/2020 16:45, Xeno Amess wrote:
> >> I've pushed change to the pom which allows compilation on Java14.
> >
> > Well it might be silly to ask but, is there a mechanism for us to make
> sure
> > that openjdk 6 output jar of this repo can be run totally correct on
> newer
> > JVM s?
>
> As per the email you replied to, Seb configured Animal sniffer to check
> this.
>
> Mark
>
>
> > sebb <seb...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月16日周日 下午11:37写道:
> >
> >> I've also updated LOGGING to build on Java12+
> >>
> >> The animal-sniffer signature should catch incompatible changes.
> >>
> >> AFAICT there is therefore no need to change the minimum version merely
> >> to make CI easier.
> >>
> >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 16:05, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 16/08/2020 15:45, sebb wrote:
> >>>> I've pushed change to the pom which allows compilation on Java14.
> >>>>
> >>>> Will that suffice?
> >>>
> >>> That certainly works for me. Thanks for doing this.
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:29, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 11:13, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I suddenly arise a good idea...
> >>>>>> How about
> >>>>>> 1. we release a java 7 version of this repo.
> >>>>>> 2. we wait for user argue about this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That has already happened ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As noted earlier in this thread, Tomcat needs a version that compiles
> >> on Java 6
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 3. if no users argue about this, we just go forward to 7.
> >> Otherwise, we
> >>>>>> re-consider about this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 于 2020年8月16日周日 下午6:08写道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 15/08/2020 19:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 1:14 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/08/2020 17:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> As recently done for [EMAIL], I propose we update [LOGGING] and
> >>>>>>> [DAEMON]
> >>>>>>>>>> from Java 6 to 7 to streamline building on CIs.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -1 for DAEMON. Tomcat 7 depends on it and has a specification
> >> mandated
> >>>>>>>>> requirement to run on Java 6.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yikes ;-) how long is rein in antiquity planned to last? ;-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tomcat 7 EOL is 31 March 2021.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Like most major Tomcat versions, it has been supported for ~10
> years
> >>>>>>> since the first release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The scary thing is that the users mailing list still sees questions
> >>>>>>> about Tomcat 6 and earlier.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We might need a branch for Tomcat so the project can move ahead in
> >> a more
> >>>>>>>> modern setting IMO.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Unless there is a feature that NEEDS Java 7, branching is just
> >> going to
> >>>>>>> create unnecessary overhead. My experience of DAEMON over that last
> >> few
> >>>>>>> years is the most (all?) of the work has been on the native code
> >> side.
> >>>>>>> Therefore, I don't see the harm in keeping the Java side on 1.6 for
> >> now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If the issue is the inability to build with newer Java versions, I
> >> have
> >>>>>>> no issue updating the declared minimum version as long as the Java
> >> code
> >>>>>>> remains compilable with/for Java 6.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mark
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Are there any features / bugs in Jira that require this increase?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Mark
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to