If you want to build on CentOS for releases that is fine - I can add Docker Build Environments as a Travis job that use older CentOS.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 18:02, Geoffrey Blake <geoffrey.w.bl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it depends on whether using Ubuntu 14.04/16.04 as the base > distro for releases is ok. It seems most projects like to build on > some variant of RHEL/CentOS as they typically use stable (read older) > compilers and libc. > > Does Travis allow building all the binaries then having a final > process that gathers all the artifacts up in the end to perform the > release? > > @garydgregory, thoughts on this? > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:39 AM Adam Retter > <adam.ret...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > No that https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/96 has been > > merged, we have support for Arm64, ppc64le and x64 in Travis. > > > > I wondered if it was useful for the "Release Process" if we had Travis > > build and store release artifacts? I believe we can have Travis do > > this only when Git tags are created. So if there is a Tag for each > > release (which I assume there is) - then you could have the release > > binaries built and delivered automatically for you. It is possible to > > go as far as having them uploaded to Maven Central (staging) if you > > wished. > > > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 17:40, Adam Retter <adam.ret...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > As promised, I added support for further environments to Travis - > > > https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/96 > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 16:35, Alex Remily <alex.rem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't know whether it would help the build manager with the release > > > > process, but I think it would be a good idea to update the build matrix > > > > regardless. I made an attempt a while ago to add coverage for more > > > > environments, but ultimately I wasn't successful. I don't recall if the > > > > limitations were Travis's or my own, but I would certainly welcome > > > > someone > > > > fleshing out the build matrix to test against OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1 APIs > > > > in > > > > whatever Windows, Mac, Linux and Arm64 environments Travis supports. My > > > > $0.02. > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:53 AM Adam Retter > > > > <adam.ret...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Travis now offer Arm64 and Mac. I could setup a job to build binaries > > > > > on > > > > > Travis and keep a copy either on every commit or when a tag is > > > > > created. > > > > > Would that be helpful? > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, 03:13 Gary Gregory, <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:57 PM Alex Remily <alex.rem...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can do the 64 bit builds on Mac, Linux and Windows, so I'm > > > > > > > happy to > > > > > > > provide whichever of those is required. It seems that Geoff can > > > > > > > do the > > > > > > > arm64 build. Do we even bother supporting 32 bit architectures > > > > > > > at this > > > > > > > point? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, we cannot just pick up bits from folks here and > > > > > > there. It > > > > > > all has to be buildable from Maven by the release manager in order > > > > > > to > > > > > > generate the file signatures properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on what I see in the docs, it looks like this is buildable > > > > > > using > > > > > > cross-compilation with MinGW on Windows. Not sure about the Mac > > > > > > stuff > > > > > yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what the use-case is for 32-bit at this point. > > > > > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 7:36 PM Marcelo Vanzin <van...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Gary, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:53 AM Gary Gregory > > > > > > > > <garydgreg...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The 1.0 release on maven central only included linux32 and > > > > > linux64 > > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > > libs, even though the Makefile supports many more targets > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please see the snapshot builds which now include more: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/commons/commons-crypto/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the native stuff in your snapshot jar: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $ jar tf commons-crypto-1.1.0-20200411.124009-5.jar | grep > > > > > > > > nativeorg/apache/commons/crypto/native/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/libcommons-crypto.so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the 1.0 release: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $ jar tf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~/.ivy2/cache/org.apache.commons/commons-crypto/jars/commons-crypto-1.0.0.jar > > > > > > > > | grep native > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Mac/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Mac/x86_64/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86_64/ > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86/libcommons-crypto.so > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/libcommons-crypto.so > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Mac/x86_64/libcommons-crypto.jnilib > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86/commons-crypto.dll > > > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86_64/commons-crypto.dll > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the only thing that worries me: finding someone who can > > > > > > > > build > > > > > > > > all those extra native libraries. I tend to agree that linux64 > > > > > > > > is the > > > > > > > > most important one, but it would be technically a regression > > > > > > > > from 1.0 > > > > > > > > to skip the others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That being said, if we can't solve that, I think it's better to > > > > > > > > release something rather than nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Adam Retter > > > > > > skype: adam.retter > > > tweet: adamretter > > > http://www.adamretter.org.uk > > > > > > > > -- > > Adam Retter > > > > skype: adam.retter > > tweet: adamretter > > http://www.adamretter.org.uk > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- Adam Retter skype: adam.retter tweet: adamretter http://www.adamretter.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
