I think it depends on whether using Ubuntu 14.04/16.04 as the base
distro for releases is ok.  It seems most projects like to build on
some variant of RHEL/CentOS as they typically use stable (read older)
compilers and libc.

Does Travis allow building all the binaries then having a final
process that gathers all the artifacts up in the end to perform the
release?

@garydgregory, thoughts on this?

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:39 AM Adam Retter
<adam.ret...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> No that https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/96 has been
> merged, we have support for Arm64, ppc64le and x64 in Travis.
>
> I wondered if it was useful for the "Release Process" if we had Travis
> build and store release artifacts? I believe we can have Travis do
> this only when Git tags are created. So if there is a Tag for each
> release (which I assume there is) - then you could have the release
> binaries built and delivered automatically for you. It is possible to
> go as far as having them uploaded to Maven Central (staging) if you
> wished.
>
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 17:40, Adam Retter <adam.ret...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As promised, I added support for further environments to Travis -
> > https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/96
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 16:35, Alex Remily <alex.rem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't know whether it would help the build manager with the release
> > > process, but I think it would be a good idea to update the build matrix
> > > regardless.  I made an attempt a while ago to add coverage for more
> > > environments, but ultimately I wasn't successful.  I don't recall if the
> > > limitations were Travis's or my own, but I would certainly welcome someone
> > > fleshing out the build matrix to test against OpenSSL 1.0 and 1.1 APIs in
> > > whatever Windows, Mac, Linux and Arm64 environments Travis supports.  My
> > > $0.02.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:53 AM Adam Retter
> > > <adam.ret...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Travis now offer Arm64 and Mac. I could setup a job to build binaries on
> > > > Travis and keep a copy either on every commit or when a tag is created.
> > > > Would that be helpful?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, 03:13 Gary Gregory, <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:57 PM Alex Remily <alex.rem...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I can do the 64 bit builds on Mac, Linux and Windows, so I'm happy 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > provide whichever of those is required.  It seems that Geoff can do 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > arm64 build.  Do we even bother supporting 32 bit architectures at 
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > point?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, we cannot just pick up bits from folks here and there. 
> > > > > It
> > > > > all has to be buildable from Maven by the release manager in order to
> > > > > generate the file signatures properly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on what I see in the docs, it looks like this is buildable using
> > > > > cross-compilation with MinGW on Windows. Not sure about the Mac stuff
> > > > yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure what the use-case is for 32-bit at this point.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 7:36 PM Marcelo Vanzin <van...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Gary,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:53 AM Gary Gregory 
> > > > > > > <garydgreg...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The 1.0 release on maven central only included linux32 and
> > > > linux64
> > > > > > > native
> > > > > > > > > libs, even though the Makefile supports many more targets
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please see the snapshot builds which now include more:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/commons/commons-crypto/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's the native stuff in your snapshot jar:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ jar tf commons-crypto-1.1.0-20200411.124009-5.jar | grep
> > > > > > > nativeorg/apache/commons/crypto/native/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/libcommons-crypto.so
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's the 1.0 release:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ jar tf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ~/.ivy2/cache/org.apache.commons/commons-crypto/jars/commons-crypto-1.0.0.jar
> > > > > > > | grep native
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Mac/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Mac/x86_64/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86_64/
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86/libcommons-crypto.so
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Linux/x86_64/libcommons-crypto.so
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Mac/x86_64/libcommons-crypto.jnilib
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86/commons-crypto.dll
> > > > > > > org/apache/commons/crypto/native/Windows/x86_64/commons-crypto.dll
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's the only thing that worries me: finding someone who can 
> > > > > > > build
> > > > > > > all those extra native libraries. I tend to agree that linux64 is 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > most important one, but it would be technically a regression from 
> > > > > > > 1.0
> > > > > > > to skip the others.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That being said, if we can't solve that, I think it's better to
> > > > > > > release something rather than nothing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adam Retter
> >
> > skype: adam.retter
> > tweet: adamretter
> > http://www.adamretter.org.uk
>
>
>
> --
> Adam Retter
>
> skype: adam.retter
> tweet: adamretter
> http://www.adamretter.org.uk
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to