On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, 17:27 Claude Warren, <cla...@xenei.com> wrote: > We have spoken elsewhere about removing getHasher() and adding iterator() > In addition should we add forEachBit( IntConsumer )?I
I was thinking the same. So we provide an iterator allowing failfast on the first index that fails a criteria, e.g. for contains, and a foreach allowing efficient receipt of all indexes. The only thing missing is whether we add a spliterator which has in its API the ability to specify DISTINCT and the exact size of the number of indexes. The spliterator can be a default method using the iterator to create it. An implementation can provide one if it wants. > > -- > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web > <http://like-like.xenei.com> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren >
