For those unfamiliar with MathJaX, is the javascript mechanism for 
accommodating for LaTeX (the math typesetting language, written by Donald 
Knuth) in html. 

It could be convenient to use mathematical notation in our javadoc generally. 
That said, Java doesn’t do this so it would indeed be non-standard. My opinion 
is in the +0.5 zone currently.

Thoughts?

-Rob

> On Mar 12, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Alex D Herbert (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>    [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16790478#comment-16790478
>  ] 
> 
> Alex D Herbert commented on NUMBERS-58:
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> I fixed math and statistics when I fixed Rng. However the fix is not present 
> in numbers.
> 
> The fix is to swap the  `<additionalparam>` tag for `<additionalOptions>` in 
> the `maven-javadoc-plugin` configuration.
> 
> It requires maven-javadoc-plugin version 3, which the new pom does have so 
> the fix is applicable.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Javadoc: Use MathJaX
>> --------------------
>> 
>>                Key: NUMBERS-58
>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-58
>>            Project: Commons Numbers
>>         Issue Type: Task
>>         Components: complex
>>           Reporter: Gilles
>>           Priority: Minor
>>             Labels: javadoc
>> 
>> Using MathJaX would make both reading the generated "apidocs" and reading 
>> the Javadoc from the source files a more pleasant experience.
>> Unfortunately, the generated web site fails to load the MathJax interpreter 
>> (see discussion in COMMONSSITE-100).
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v7.6.3#76005)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to