On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 08:22:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> How about releasing as "beta" i.e. 1.0-beta1? >> > > It would not reflect the real status. > As noted below, "Complex" is past beta, Great. > while some of the > other codes need review and/or a little work to settle > known issues. > Sounds like a Beta. > > Furthermore, I recall that no beta release of a Commons > project ever elicited any feedback. > So what? Getting a jar out on Maven central will give at least the that opportunity. It's better that realizing that you want some BC breaking changes _after_ a 1.0 is out. Gary > > Gilles > > > Gary >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hi. >>> >>> The modules in [Numbers] are not all in a releasable state; >>> even if a lot of work has been put in all of them, some >>> need even more to be on a par with e.g. the "Complex" class. >>> >>> It doesn't seem to serve any purpose to further delay the >>> release as there isn't any activity towards resolving the >>> issues that concerns the other modules. >>> >>> Thus, I'd like to release "commons-numbers-complex" (without >>> "ComplexUtils") and its dependencies, as well as a few other >>> modules which one would expect can be stable in the long run. >>> Will some people review the modules and afferent issues to >>> give an opinion on those they'd think would be ready for prime >>> time? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gilles >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
