On Thu, 10 May 2018 08:22:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
How about releasing as "beta" i.e. 1.0-beta1?
It would not reflect the real status.
As noted below, "Complex" is past beta, while some of the
other codes need review and/or a little work to settle
known issues.
Furthermore, I recall that no beta release of a Commons
project ever elicited any feedback.
Gilles
Gary
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Gilles
<gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
Hi.
The modules in [Numbers] are not all in a releasable state;
even if a lot of work has been put in all of them, some
need even more to be on a par with e.g. the "Complex" class.
It doesn't seem to serve any purpose to further delay the
release as there isn't any activity towards resolving the
issues that concerns the other modules.
Thus, I'd like to release "commons-numbers-complex" (without
"ComplexUtils") and its dependencies, as well as a few other
modules which one would expect can be stable in the long run.
Will some people review the modules and afferent issues to
give an opinion on those they'd think would be ready for prime
time?
Thanks,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
