Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/49#discussion_r168275645
--- Diff:
commons-rdf-simple/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/experimental/AbstractRDFParser.java
---
@@ -58,8 +60,12 @@
*/
public abstract class AbstractRDFParser<T extends AbstractRDFParser<T>>
implements RDFParser, Cloneable {
- public static final ThreadGroup threadGroup = new ThreadGroup("Commons
RDF parsers");
- private static final ExecutorService threadpool =
Executors.newCachedThreadPool(r -> new Thread(threadGroup, r));
+ public static final AtomicInteger threadCount = new AtomicInteger();
+ private static Thread newThread(Runnable r) {
--- End diff --
That's why I put [the name "Commons RDF Parser
"](https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/49/files/f1649e034a2623137434fcc2810f8802d3ee9434#diff-68c2acaf43f1ae22da0bdb4eac55a201R65)
back in. But like I said, I am fine with whatever- I was just tearing through
PMD warnings at speed after the comment (I think to the board report) about
there being a lot of them. Shall I take your comment as a direction to remove
this change? Happy to...
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
