Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/49#discussion_r168260775
--- Diff:
commons-rdf-simple/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/simple/experimental/AbstractRDFParser.java
---
@@ -58,8 +60,12 @@
*/
public abstract class AbstractRDFParser<T extends AbstractRDFParser<T>>
implements RDFParser, Cloneable {
- public static final ThreadGroup threadGroup = new ThreadGroup("Commons
RDF parsers");
- private static final ExecutorService threadpool =
Executors.newCachedThreadPool(r -> new Thread(threadGroup, r));
+ public static final AtomicInteger threadCount = new AtomicInteger();
+ private static Thread newThread(Runnable r) {
--- End diff --
Because either FindBugs or PMD (can't remember) which called out
`ThreadGroup` as not threadsafe, which is correct as far as I know. I am in
_no_ way wedded to this change and if we can guarantee thread-safety from
outside the class (or simply document it as not threadsafe) I would be happy to
pull this change out.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
