Github user wikier commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
Having a little understanding on the concrete use case behind this PR,
generally speaking I normally prefer having the factories/builders implementing
`Serializable`. So in this concrete case I probably agree that the parser
doesn't need that configuration. But again, I lack the background that
motivated this request. Maybe having @ansell clarifying
[`COMMONSRDF-49`](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-49) may help
to lead to a conclusion.
So, regarding the ongoing `0.5.0` release, I think it'd be better to keep
this out of `RC2`, refine the requirements, and then reach an agreement that
could be shipped in a future release.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
