Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
I'd like to get @wikier an answer to his question. It sounds like we are
_not_ comfortable merging this for `RC2` and he should go ahead without it,
correct?
If the consensus is that serializable config should be factored out of
`AbstractRDFParser` (and I agree with that approach) than I think we should
close `COMMONSRDF-49` and open a new ticket that is more exact (or edit
`COMMONSRDF-49`) so that @ansell understands what to expect. I don't have the
mojo in Commons RDF's Jira to do that.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
