This is a bit different since my case was to get annoutput of where a test can lock and not a diff. But technically it is close.
Le 5 nov. 2017 20:21, "Bernd Eckenfels" <e...@zusammenkunft.net> a écrit : > Hello, > > > commons-vfs does this (at the Moment it only dumps the threads and does > not break the build) > > https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/blob/trunk/ > commons-vfs2/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/test/ > AbstractTestSuite.java#L213 > > > Gruss > Bernd > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > > Von: Romain Manni-Bucau > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. November 2017 16:31 > An: Commons Developers List > Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > > This daemon thing is interesting, I something similar to dump each N > seconds threads to investigate some tests locking on a CI. Can goes > there as well probably. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn > > > 2017-11-05 16:23 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>: > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> So are you advocating for a multi-module project? > >> > >> - commons-testing > >> - commons-testing-junit4 > >> - commons-testing-junit5 > >> > >> ? > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Bernd Eckenfels < > e...@zusammenkunft.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I like the idea (and prefer Commons Testing), for example a method to > >>> list all non-daemon threads after a test run (to see there is no > resource > >>> leak) can be used independent of the Unit Test Framework. > >>> > >> > > Do you have such a gadget? > > > > Gary > > > > > >> > >>> Gruss > >>> Bernd > >>> -- > >>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Hasan Diwan <hasan.di...@gmail.com> > >>> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM > >>> To: Commons Developers List > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > >>> > >>> How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H > >>> > >>> On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher < > >>> > pascalschumac...@gmx.net> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > JUnit 5 is not backwards compatible (Package/Annotation-Names have > >>> > > changed, Rules were replaced by a new extension model), but it can > run > >>> > > JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 Tests if you add an additional dependency. See > >>> > > http://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#migrating-f > >>> rom-junit4 > >>> > > for details. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > OK, so "Apache Commons Extras for Junit 4" > >>> > > >>> > Gary > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Am 04.11.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Gary Gregory: > >>> > > > >>> > >> I am assuming that JUnit 5 will be backward compatible with JUnit > 4, > >>> I > >>> > >> might be wrong. I'd like to focus on a single dependency for now > >>> (JUnit) > >>> > >> and not do a multi-module project. If someone want to do the same > for > >>> > >> TestNG, then have at it. KISS and small for 1.0. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Gary > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > >>> > >> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ. > >>> > >>> CheersBruno > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > >>> > >>> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about > >>> > pulling > >>> > >>> in > >>> > >>> other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General > >>> > >>> resource > >>> > >>> management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in > >>> > Log4j. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting JUnit > 5.x > >>> as > >>> > >>> well > >>> > >>> would be nice. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3 November 2017 at 18:11, Gary Gregory < > garydgreg...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons > JUnit". > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code like JUnit > >>> rules. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit. > >>> > >>>> SetDefaultLocaleTestRule > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> I have other rules stashed here and there as well, for example a > >>> Set > >>> > >>>> Default Charset Rule. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Gary > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> OpenPGP: > >>> https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1 > >>> If you wish to request my time, please do so using > >>> http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest. > >>> Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a > >>> http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest. > >>> > >>> <https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search= > 0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1 > >>> >Sent > >>> from my mobile device > >>> Envoye de mon portable > >>> > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >
