I like the idea (and prefer Commons Testing), for example a method to list all 
non-daemon threads after a test run (to see there is no resource leak) can be 
used independent of the Unit Test Framework.

Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
________________________________
From: Hasan Diwan <hasan.di...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit

How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H

On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
> pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
> > JUnit 5 is not backwards compatible (Package/Annotation-Names have
> > changed, Rules were replaced by a new extension model), but it can run
> > JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 Tests if you add an additional dependency. See
> > http://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#migrating-from-junit4
> > for details.
>
>
> OK, so "Apache Commons Extras for Junit 4"
>
> Gary
>
>
> >
> >
> > Am 04.11.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> >
> >> I am assuming that JUnit 5 will be backward compatible with JUnit 4, I
> >> might be wrong. I'd like to focus on a single dependency for now (JUnit)
> >> and not do a multi-module project. If someone want to do the same for
> >> TestNG, then have at it. KISS and small for 1.0.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
> >> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
> >>> CheersBruno
> >>>
> >>>        From: Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> >>>   To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> >>>   Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM
> >>>   Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
> >>>
> >>> I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are good about
> pulling
> >>> in
> >>> other related dependencies to complement the whole thing. General
> >>> resource
> >>> management rules would be great, though, like the ones we have in
> Log4j.
> >>>
> >>> Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting JUnit 5.x as
> >>> well
> >>> would be nice.
> >>>
> >>> On 3 November 2017 at 18:11, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache Commons JUnit".
> >>>>
> >>>> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code like JUnit rules.
> >>>>
> >>>> This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only.
> >>>>
> >>>> For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit.
> >>>> SetDefaultLocaleTestRule
> >>>>
> >>>> I have other rules stashed here and there as well, for example a Set
> >>>> Default Charset Rule.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Gary
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>



--
OpenPGP:
https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1
If you wish to request my time, please do so using
http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest.
Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a
http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest.

<https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1>Sent
from my mobile device
Envoye de mon portable

Reply via email to