Le 31/08/2017 à 23:33, Gilles a écrit : > it's a pity we cannot meet in person to sort all those issues
Hum, maybe with a few beers you'll be easier to convince ;) > I'm not against you modularizing CM, I'm against me doing it > just because you "think" it's a better approach to the > (management) problems which I've been describing for at least > two years (and some more). I understand your point of view, you don't want to spent a lot of time modularizing CM, dealing with parts of the code you are not comfortable with and delaying the release of code you really care about. That's fair and I agree this shouldn't be forced upon you. The good news is you don't actually have to refactor *all* of CM as a multi-module project right now. Start with a mostly empty branch containing just a couple of modules you like and release them. And you progressively bring more modules after each release from the old CM branch. That's equivalent to the creation of multiple components (you cherry-pick the code that you want, and release it when ready), and you keep the lightweight management of a single component. Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
