> On Jul 28, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, I'm taking Commons Text as my test guineapig for jacoco style > implementation , once confident in implementation we can move it to other > components. >
Sounds good to me. > Regards, > Amey > >> On Jul 28, 2017 5:39 PM, "Rob Tompkins" <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> If this is still pending I would like to pickup this task. If docker is >> not >>> much helpful OR we need to wait for it I think we should try what jacoco >>> did. what do you think ? >> >> Sure. That makes sense to me, especially since the Travis folks say that >> they’ve got on the backlog to install the IBM JDKs on their build >> environments. >> >>> >>> Is it mandatory to use official java images ?Else I am also thinking to >>> create my own ibmjdk8 image on top of given by IBM and have some tools >> and >>> scrips ready in that so on fail it should return -1. >> >> I contributed to the official maven docker image to add the ibm jdk, but >> I”m not sure how the build works out there. So I’m not sure it’s in docker >> hub yet. >> >>> >>> Not sure how much travis-ci be helpful here since I saw Pascal removed >>> oraclejdk7 from .travis configuration because its not available. I'm not >>> keeping much hopes on Travis at this point as their provision on >> different >>> jdk images seems very slow to me . >> >> I think there was some flavour of issue with Java7 in that the image >> wasn’t loading properly. It could be worth trying the jacoco approach to >> see if that works. >> >> -Rob >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Amey >>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017, 6:43 PM Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> Pardon my disappearance for the last week or so. My day job has been a >>>> little over consuming (c’est la vie). Regardless, I’ve been looking at >> how >>>> we can use the current appetite in the travis-ci community to push them >> to >>>> install ibmjava8 and ibmjava9 in this working thread: >>>> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2682 < >>>> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2682>. Hopefully we can >>>> gain some traction there. >>>> >>>> Regardless, they seem to have far more idk’s installed in their build >>>> environment than documented >>>> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-cookbooks/tree/master/ >> cookbooks/travis_java/recipes >>>> < >>>> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-cookbooks/tree/master/ >> cookbooks/travis_java/recipes>. >>>> Which, as Amey noted earlier, jacoco seems to be utilizing >>>> https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/.travis.yml#L14-L23 < >>>> https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/.travis.yml#L14-L23>. >>>> >>>> I’m not particularly looking for any responses to this email. I more >> just >>>> wanted to document my current research efforts here. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -Rob >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
