Hi Rob, If this is still pending I would like to pickup this task. If docker is not much helpful OR we need to wait for it I think we should try what jacoco did. what do you think ?
Is it mandatory to use official java images ?Else I am also thinking to create my own ibmjdk8 image on top of given by IBM and have some tools and scrips ready in that so on fail it should return -1. Not sure how much travis-ci be helpful here since I saw Pascal removed oraclejdk7 from .travis configuration because its not available. I'm not keeping much hopes on Travis at this point as their provision on different jdk images seems very slow to me . Regards, Amey On Sat, Jul 1, 2017, 6:43 PM Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Pardon my disappearance for the last week or so. My day job has been a > little over consuming (c’est la vie). Regardless, I’ve been looking at how > we can use the current appetite in the travis-ci community to push them to > install ibmjava8 and ibmjava9 in this working thread: > https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2682 < > https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2682>. Hopefully we can > gain some traction there. > > Regardless, they seem to have far more idk’s installed in their build > environment than documented > https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-cookbooks/tree/master/cookbooks/travis_java/recipes > < > https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-cookbooks/tree/master/cookbooks/travis_java/recipes>. > Which, as Amey noted earlier, jacoco seems to be utilizing > https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/.travis.yml#L14-L23 < > https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/.travis.yml#L14-L23>. > > I’m not particularly looking for any responses to this email. I more just > wanted to document my current research efforts here. > > Cheers, > -Rob
