On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> I've just noticed a small problem in the (staged) web site > submitted for the release of Commons RNG v1.0: > http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC6-site/rat-report.html > > Since this must be fixed in the regenerated site will > not reflect the released version number, why do we > actually have to vote on the site? In my opinion: We do not vote on the site. Which is why deficiencies in the proposed site aren't blocking a release. That being said: a) The proposed site may be helpful for the release vote, if for no other reasons than the RAT report. b) The proposal leads to people verifying the site, which they usually wouldn't do. Jochen http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
