On 2016-12-08, Gilles wrote: > Hi.
> I've just noticed a small problem in the (staged) web site > submitted for the release of Commons RNG v1.0: > http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC6-site/rat-report.html > Since this must be fixed in the regenerated site will > not reflect the released version number, why do we > actually have to vote on the site? IMHO we don't really vote on the site. For all the COMPRESS releases I've always said "this is not the site I'm going to publish when the release is final" and it's been fine. We can publish the site independently of releases and maybe don't do that often enough. The site is part of the vote template as it provides access to a couple of reports that may be interesting to people voting. A RAT report that shows a violation is a reason to vote with -1. But that doesn't mean we are voting on the site. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
