Hi.
The "Commons RNG" component (in the "Apache Commons" sense),
consists of the following modules (in the "maven" sense) that
provide Java code:
(1) commons-rng-client-api
(2) commons-rng-core
(3) commons-rng-simple
(4) commons-rng-sampling
(5) commons-rng-jmh
(6) commons-rng-examples
One could see the RNG low-level "library" as composed of (1),
(2) and (3).
(4) is higher-level; it depends solely on the "UniformRandomProvider"
interface defined in (1).
(5) does not provide any functionality to application developers.
(6) contains working code that is either of interest to "Commons
RNG" contributors (for running the "stress" tests) or currently,
fairly trivial (and not recommended) examples of use of the
"library".
Questions:
a. Is it OK if the official release does not contain (5) and (6)?
[Rationale is that it would allow to make changes without
bothering about compatibility with _unintended_ uses.]
b. If so, is it still OK to provide JARs for them via the web site
(but not upload them to Nexus)?
c. Is it OK that the modules have different versions (reflecting
the perceived status of development)?
[This is related to the "commons-rng-sampling" issue of the
post with subject "Ralease policy for version < 1".]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
