+1 binding.

Kristian


2016-07-05 21:21 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>:
> Because of the failing test I also feel a bit uneasy, but nevertheless I
> am +1: It is only a test class, the problem occurs only in a specific
> setup, it is already fixed in trunk, and the release is really overdue.
>
> Thanks
> Oliver
>
> Am 05.07.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
>> This vote is still pending and nobody has voted so far. Please review this
>> RC and cast your votes!
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Benedikt
>>
>> Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> schrieb am Sa., 2. Juli 2016 um
>> 20:52 Uhr:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7. Changes compared
>>> to RC6 are:
>>>
>>> - restored binary compatibility to a greater degree
>>> - fixed issue BCEL-262
>>>
>>> BCEL 6.0 RC7 is available for review here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/ (svn revision 14251)
>>>
>>> The tag is here:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC7/
>>> (svn revision 1751084)
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts are here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1181/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/
>>>
>>> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes
>>>
>>> bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar
>>>   (SHA1: f1e1534867a901b9ba4884e5805317635c324589)
>>> bcel-6.0-sources.jar
>>>   (SHA1: 9ba3b50aa95289d01ec119b60be68eb4c608ba1d)
>>> bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar
>>>   (SHA1: 484b29d3a73fbe0c103d85965c4fd22e6253f545)
>>> bcel-6.0-tests.jar
>>>   (SHA1: f8b5857f3245e10548ef29cf7006c045b913a199)
>>> bcel-6.0.jar
>>>   (SHA1: fe1ecaf2ba3b1f9f18cdde4f13943e3ccc1d5e69)
>>> bcel-6.0.pom
>>>   (SHA1: ea17ee1b2c28804437212970ea2d273efeb3807e)
>>>
>>> I have tested this with JDK 7, 8 using Maven 3.3.9.
>>>
>>> Details of changes since 1.1 are in the release notes:
>>>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/changes-report.html
>>>
>>> Site:
>>>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/
>>> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not yet
>>> created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
>>>
>>> Clirr Report (compared to 5.2):
>>>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/clirr-report.html
>>>
>>> Note that Clirr reports several errors.
>>> These are considered OK for the reasons stated below.
>>> These exceptions are also noted in the Changes and Release Notes.
>>>
>>> Errors reported:
>>> - methods added to org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface: OK because
>>> that does not affect binary compatibility.
>>> - Removed java.io.Serializable from all classes: OK, because we don't
>>> expect anybody to rely on serialization for BCEL classes
>>> - Return type of method 'public java.lang.Object getElementAt(int)' has
>>> been changed to java.lang.String in class
>>> org.apache.bcel.verifier.VerifierFactoryListModel: OK, because this class
>>> is part of an UI application and for this reason should only used by Swing.
>>>
>>> RAT Report:
>>>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/rat-report.html
>>>
>>> KEYS:
>>>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no
>>> sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime after 21:00 CEST 05-July 2016
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Benedikt
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to