What are stack traces for the errors? All the tests pass for me on Windows 7 with this RC. I added some test code to find all Java installs since the last RC. I see you are on Windows 10, so I am curious as to your failures, stack traces and windows registry set up.
Gary On Jul 3, 2016 7:50 AM, "Oliver Heger" <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote: > Hi, > > when building from the source distribution with both Java 1.7 and 1.8 I > get the following test failure: > > Results : > > Tests in error: > > > JDKGenericDumpTestCase.data:60->findJavaHomes:65->findJavaHomesOnWindows:77->findJavaHomesOnWindows:84 > ยป Win32 > > Tests run: 102, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 > > Does anybody else see this? I do not remember this failure with the last > RC. Below is my platform: > > c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\bcel\bcel-6.0-src>mvn -version > Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; > 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00) > Maven home: c:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.3.9\bin\.. > Java version: 1.8.0_66, vendor: Oracle Corporation > Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_66\jre > Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252 > OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos" > > Oliver > > Am 02.07.2016 um 20:52 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7. Changes > compared > > to RC6 are: > > > > - restored binary compatibility to a greater degree > > - fixed issue BCEL-262 > > > > BCEL 6.0 RC7 is available for review here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/ (svn revision > 14251) > > > > The tag is here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC7/ > (svn > > revision 1751084) > > > > Maven artifacts are here: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1181/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > > > > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes > > > > bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar > > (SHA1: f1e1534867a901b9ba4884e5805317635c324589) > > bcel-6.0-sources.jar > > (SHA1: 9ba3b50aa95289d01ec119b60be68eb4c608ba1d) > > bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar > > (SHA1: 484b29d3a73fbe0c103d85965c4fd22e6253f545) > > bcel-6.0-tests.jar > > (SHA1: f8b5857f3245e10548ef29cf7006c045b913a199) > > bcel-6.0.jar > > (SHA1: fe1ecaf2ba3b1f9f18cdde4f13943e3ccc1d5e69) > > bcel-6.0.pom > > (SHA1: ea17ee1b2c28804437212970ea2d273efeb3807e) > > > > I have tested this with JDK 7, 8 using Maven 3.3.9. > > > > Details of changes since 1.1 are in the release notes: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/changes-report.html > > > > Site: > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/ > > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not > yet > > created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > > > > Clirr Report (compared to 5.2): > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/clirr-report.html > > > > Note that Clirr reports several errors. > > These are considered OK for the reasons stated below. > > These exceptions are also noted in the Changes and Release Notes. > > > > Errors reported: > > - methods added to org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface: OK > because > > that does not affect binary compatibility. > > - Removed java.io.Serializable from all classes: OK, because we don't > > expect anybody to rely on serialization for BCEL classes > > - Return type of method 'public java.lang.Object getElementAt(int)' has > > been changed to java.lang.String in class > > org.apache.bcel.verifier.VerifierFactoryListModel: OK, because this class > > is part of an UI application and for this reason should only used by > Swing. > > > > RAT Report: > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC7/rat-report.html > > > > KEYS: > > https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no > > sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime after 21:00 CEST 05-July > 2016 > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > > Thanks! > > Benedikt > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
