Sorry - I'm replying to my own post. Is there any chance that there is a revision point in the active tree that corresponds exactly to RC6 but without the path changes? I could do some testing on that.
Probably too much to hope for. Thanks, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Roberts [mailto:mar...@cs.washington.edu] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 4:12 PM > To: 'Commons Developers List' > Cc: 'findbugs-disc...@cs.umd.edu'; 'findbugs-c...@lists.sourceforge.net' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6 > > Well I was clearly confused about this release. It has reverted back to the > old > class hierarchy in the name of binary compatibility. I can see now that that > was the intention and it makes sense. However, I cannot test it (and hence > vote up or down) as I am certainly not going to edit all my sources back to > the > 'old' system. > > So my question is what is the plan? This release gets me no closer to a place > where I can quit providing my own version of BCEL with our Daikon product. > What is the plan for a release from the active tree with the new class > hierarchy? > > Thank you, > Mark Roberts > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] > > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:37 PM > > To: Commons Developers List > > Cc: findbugs-disc...@cs.umd.edu; findbugs-c...@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6 > > > > Hi, > > > > after some build related problems with RC5, I'd like to call a vote to > > release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6. The only changes > > compared to > > RC5 is a fix in the source assembly: It now includes all files > > necessary to run a clean build. > > > > BCEL 6.0 RC6 is available for review here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14065) > > > > The tag is here: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_R > > C6 > > (rev 1749388) > > > > Maven artifacts are here: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons- > > 1179/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > > > > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes: > > > > bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar > > (SHA1: 89cf95656f0f8a93e77100c8d5811f7cd9af866b) > > bcel-6.0-sources.jar > > (SHA1: 162f96530e8935e8a71a9e6d5497026aa3bdc945) > > bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar > > (SHA1: 2b07be3a0a4560c9766d3261cd012cf636fe965a) > > bcel-6.0-tests.jar > > (SHA1: 9e825da46e0cd66f87ccd907a43c4e2ebd15b8d6) > > bcel-6.0.jar > > (SHA1: 09d0a4c32ba6c3c22f0680f89ceeaf3e677ac659) > > bcel-6.0.pom > > (SHA1: a5d48ac34909f3a0ac788d37835075be5c2bb9d7) > > > > I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS 10.11.5. > > > > Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE- > NOTES.txt > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/changes- > > report.html > > > > Site: > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/ > > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not > > yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > > > > Clirr Report (compared to 5.2): > > > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/clirr-report.html > > > > Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on > > the ML already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody > > the opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These > > changes are also explicitly noted in the Release notes. > > > > Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL > > classes. An extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed > here: > > > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/bcel5-bcel6-clirr > > - > > report.html > > > > We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason > > for users to serialize BCEL classes. > > > > RAT Report: > > > > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/rat-report.html > > > > KEYS: > > https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime > > after > > 22:00 CEST 23-June 2016 > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > > We're almost there... :-) > > Thanks! > > Benedikt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
