Still +1 (for the previous state, if binary isn't changed compared with the previous RC build).
Am 20. Juni 2016 21:36:56 MESZ, schrieb Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>: >Hi, > >after some build related problems with RC5, I'd like to call a vote to >release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6. The only changes compared >to >RC5 is a fix in the source assembly: It now includes all files >necessary to >run a clean build. > >BCEL 6.0 RC6 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14065) > >The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC6 > (rev 1749388) > >Maven artifacts are here: > >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1179/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > >These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes: > >bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar >(SHA1: 89cf95656f0f8a93e77100c8d5811f7cd9af866b) >bcel-6.0-sources.jar >(SHA1: 162f96530e8935e8a71a9e6d5497026aa3bdc945) >bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar >(SHA1: 2b07be3a0a4560c9766d3261cd012cf636fe965a) >bcel-6.0-tests.jar >(SHA1: 9e825da46e0cd66f87ccd907a43c4e2ebd15b8d6) >bcel-6.0.jar >(SHA1: 09d0a4c32ba6c3c22f0680f89ceeaf3e677ac659) >bcel-6.0.pom >(SHA1: a5d48ac34909f3a0ac788d37835075be5c2bb9d7) > >I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS >10.11.5. > >Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/changes-report.html > >Site: > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/ >(note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not >yet >created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > >Clirr Report (compared to 5.2): > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/clirr-report.html > >Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on >the ML >already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody the >opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These changes >are >also explicitly noted in the Release notes. > >Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL >classes. An >extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed here: > >http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/bcel5-bcel6-clirr-report.html > >We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason >for >users to serialize BCEL classes. > >RAT Report: > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/rat-report.html > >KEYS: > https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > >Please review the release candidate and vote. >This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, >i.e. sometime after 22:00 CEST 23-June 2016 > >[ ] +1 Release these artifacts >[ ] +0 OK, but... >[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >[ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > >We're almost there... :-) >Thanks! >Benedikt -- Kind regards, Andrey Loskutov http://google.com/+AndreyLoskutov --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
