On 12 June 2016 at 15:21, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've uploaded the verbose Clirr report to my space at home.apache.org [1]. >> Do we have to fix all of this in order to release 6.0? > > > I'd suggest to leave the java.io.Serializable stuff, as it is. In > practice, this will only be noticed, if anyone is actually > serializing/deserializing these items, and I assume that the interface > has been removed for a reason. (Meaning: Although the interface > declaration is present, they most likely aren't actually > serializable.)
I don't follow what you are suggesting. Serializable has been removed from everything, as it does not make sense to serialise BCEl and anyway was not supported properly. Are you suggesting implements Serializable should be restored? > Jochen > > > -- > The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" > > http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
