On 12 June 2016 at 12:43, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > sebb <seb...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 12. Juni 2016 um 13:38 Uhr: > >> On 12 June 2016 at 12:00, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've uploaded the verbose Clirr report to my space at home.apache.org >> [1]. >> > Do we have to fix all of this in order to release 6.0? >> >> No, most of the changes don't break strict BC. >> >> The main changes to the interfaces don't break BC and are highly >> unlikely to affect source because there are abstract implementation >> classes. >> >> See the changes.xml file and release notes for some details. >> > > Thank you, I will have a look. Can we compile a list of things we need to > fix for 6.0?
Unfortunately the lack of updates has caused downstream users to rely on non-released code. I think we should try and ensure that we don't make things worse. Therefore I don't think we can compile a full list without assistance from FindBugs and other consumers of the code. I suspect this will be an iterative process to try and find the best compromise that suits these users as well as users who have only used formal releases. > Benedikt > > >> >> > Benedikt >> > >> > [1] >> > >> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-SNAPSHOT/clirr-report.html >> > >> > sebb <seb...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 8. Juni 2016 um 11:54 Uhr: >> > >> >> On 8 June 2016 at 10:46, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Hello sebb, >> >> > >> >> > sebb <seb...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 8. Juni 2016 um 11:21 Uhr: >> >> > >> >> >> Was that the full report, or the 'quietened' one? >> >> >> There's a Clirr suppression file which removes some diffs that are >> >> >> considered non-breaking (as per the changes description) >> >> >> (otherwise the report is rather difficult to read) >> >> >> >> >> >> To show all the errors, use -P!quieten-clirr or >> -Dclirr.allDifferences >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > The report is the result of running mvn clean site. So if >> quiten-clirr is >> >> > activated by default it's the 'quitened' one (sorry I currently don't >> >> have >> >> > time to look into the pom). >> >> >> >> Yes, it is the default. >> >> >> >> > I can upload the "real" report to home.apache.org tonight when I'm at >> >> home. >> >> >> >> OK, thanks. >> >> >> >> > Benedikt >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 8 June 2016 at 09:35, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi all, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I've published the BCEL website after reverting the package rename. >> >> Here >> >> >> > [1] is the Clirr report of the current code base. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Benedikt >> >> >> > >> >> >> > [1] >> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/clirr-report.html >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
