On Jun 7, 2016 9:07 AM, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7 June 2016 at 16:42, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello Gary, > > > > Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 7. Juni 2016 um > > 04:01 Uhr: > > > >> Hi All: > >> > >> IMO. if [crypto] is to have a dependency on a logging framework, it should > >> be Log4j 2, not Commons Logging. Log4j 2 has an API module, which you can > >> pair with any number of implementations: Log4j's own Core, JUL, SLF4J, and > >> so on. > >> > > > > I agree, but I'd say a low level component like crypto should not do any > > logging at all. > > > > +1 to not logging
I'm OK with logging to Log4j 2 but I won't stop you from removing logging altogether. Gary > > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> -- > >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ > >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >
