On 7 June 2016 at 16:42, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 7. Juni 2016 um
> 04:01 Uhr:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> IMO. if [crypto] is to have a dependency on a logging framework, it should
>> be Log4j 2, not Commons Logging. Log4j 2 has an API module, which you can
>> pair with any number of implementations: Log4j's own Core, JUL, SLF4J, and
>> so on.
>>
>
> I agree, but I'd say a low level component like crypto should not do any
> logging at all.
>

+1 to not logging

>>
>> Gary
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to