Actually, a 6.0 release with the same coordinates would imply that there are behavioral changes but the API is sufficiently compatible that you won’t get things like NoSuchMethodError.
Ralph > On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Andrey Loskutov <losku...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 June 2016 17:26 sebb wrote: >> On 7 June 2016 at 17:18, Andrey Loskutov <losku...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 June 2016 17:15 sebb wrote: >>>> There have been quite a lot of changes to BCEL since 5.2. >>>> >>>> Lots of places currently mention 6.0 (@since; JIRA; probably elsewhere). >>>> >>>> So whilst 5.3 might be OK as the next release version, it's going to >>>> be a lot of work to change all the references. >>>> >>>> I therefore propose we should use 6.0 for the backwards compatible >>>> release using the original Java package names and Maven coordinates. >>>> >>>> A subsequent incompatible release can always use 7.0. >>> >>> +1 for 6.0. >>> Even if BCEL trunk code after some backwards compatible changes will don't >>> break the BC, it most likely will break the behavior. >> >> Hopefully not, otherwise it negates most of the reasons for providing >> a compatible release. >> >> It may be acceptable to break behaviour in such a way that only a few >> unusual use cases are broken, but if every downstream user has to >> recode their app then there's no point in striving for BC. >> >> AIUI the whole point of the exercise is to provide a drop-in release. > > As I saw in FindBugs after experimental port to BCEL6 > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-273), one still need to care > about behavior changes - it is a major release. > And this is acceptable for me as a user of that API, because I know that > nothing is for free. > But the hope is that this can be handled with much smaller effort and without > affecting / breaking other 3rd party libraries. > So in best case this is a drop-in, in *worst* case one need to fix some > smaller issue here and there, but it is definitely not a nightmare of > changing *everything*, entire software stack, just to be able to run on Java > 7/8. > > -- > Kind regards, > google.com/+AndreyLoskutov > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org