On Tuesday 07 June 2016 17:15 sebb wrote: > There have been quite a lot of changes to BCEL since 5.2. > > Lots of places currently mention 6.0 (@since; JIRA; probably elsewhere). > > So whilst 5.3 might be OK as the next release version, it's going to > be a lot of work to change all the references. > > I therefore propose we should use 6.0 for the backwards compatible > release using the original Java package names and Maven coordinates. > > A subsequent incompatible release can always use 7.0.
+1 for 6.0. Even if BCEL trunk code after some backwards compatible changes will don't break the BC, it most likely will break the behavior. -- Kind regards, google.com/+AndreyLoskutov --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
