Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 8. Mai 2016 um 14:06 Uhr:
> I just made 2.5 look like 2.4. How is that a change that requires > discussion? Shouldn't it have been noticed and discussed when it was > done for 2.4? > I see sebb's point. It is good to have a name tags uniformly. Some components have a wild mix of different casing in the tag names. My personal opinion is, that the tag names should just the release version number, but that is a different discussion. If this change has been made to make tag names uniform in commons-io, I don't see a problem with that. Benedikt > > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 7:17 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6 May 2016 at 13:16, <bimargul...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Author: bimargulies > >> Date: Fri May 6 12:16:39 2016 > >> New Revision: 1742534 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1742534&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Honor both tagging conventions? > > > > This is potentially confusing. > > > > I think it should have been discussed first. > > > >> Added: > >> commons/proper/io/tags/2.5/ > >> - copied from r1742533, commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.5/ > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
