I just made 2.5 look like 2.4. How is that a change that requires discussion? Shouldn't it have been noticed and discussed when it was done for 2.4?
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 7:17 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 May 2016 at 13:16, <bimargul...@apache.org> wrote: >> Author: bimargulies >> Date: Fri May 6 12:16:39 2016 >> New Revision: 1742534 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1742534&view=rev >> Log: >> Honor both tagging conventions? > > This is potentially confusing. > > I think it should have been discussed first. > >> Added: >> commons/proper/io/tags/2.5/ >> - copied from r1742533, commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.5/ >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org