I just made 2.5 look like 2.4. How is that a change that requires
discussion? Shouldn't it have been noticed and discussed when it was
done for 2.4?


On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 7:17 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 13:16,  <bimargul...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: bimargulies
>> Date: Fri May  6 12:16:39 2016
>> New Revision: 1742534
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1742534&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Honor both tagging conventions?
>
> This is potentially confusing.
>
> I think it should have been discussed first.
>
>> Added:
>>     commons/proper/io/tags/2.5/
>>       - copied from r1742533, commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.5/
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to