Jörg Schaible wrote:
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> Oh, well then! No pressure:)
>>
>> I'll have to find some time to re-read all of the conversation between
>> Jörg and Stian, but my initial reaction is the same as what you were
>> implying: compatibility across more JVMs would be great, but shouldn't
>> block this 2.1 release.
Just an additional remark: Compatibility across more JVMs*is* an issue,
since there are platforms where you have no other choice (IBM AIX, Mac, most
Linux distributions use OpenJDK by default).
Is 2.1's compatibility across JVMs worse than 2.0's was? What are the
guarantees put forth by those involved with commons-vfs for
compatibility WRT JVMs?
I'm not nit-picking JVM support -- I'm nit-picking it's severity to
block v2.1 for being released.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
