Hi Josh, Josh Elser wrote:
> Oh, well then! No pressure :) > > I'll have to find some time to re-read all of the conversation between > Jörg and Stian, but my initial reaction is the same as what you were > implying: compatibility across more JVMs would be great, but shouldn't > block this 2.1 release. This depends always on the nature of a problem. Therefore I did not make any vote for now. Currently it looks like you're right and thanks to Stian the problems are covered in trunk on top (sole the problem with the IBM JDKs). > The other points seem to be "nice to have"'s, but please bring it to my > attention is my quick glance missed something that is really bad. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
