Le 25/04/2016 11:06, sebb a écrit : > Never suggests it is impossible; however that is not the case. > It hasn't happened yet, but I can imagine that there might be a reason > to maintain two parallel release versions.
I agree older branches can keep being maintained, but we'll never bump the major version number to match the one of the current development branch. In addition to semantic versioning considerations that would be really confusing for our users. > Note that the artifact names themselves use the artifactid. > So using it in the folder name would be no different. I'd argue that the -bin and -src artifacts should also not use the artifactId. That's what I did when I released JEXL 3.0. The result is much cleaner IMO: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/jexl/source/ Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
