On 18 April 2016 at 10:43, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > Ah - as long as the INFRA and Mirror guys are OK with the potentially > extra 500 MB then that sounds good! > > I've raised > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11702 > to enquire how we should best do it. > >
I don't thiink it helps to provide links for the existing releases. Note that once we have released (say) NET 3.5, the downloads for NET 3.4 need to be removed from the mirrors. So the only place that the links will then exist is in the archives. Unless we also set up links for every past release in every Commons component, there is going to be a discontinuity at some point in the naming convention. Seems to me we either accept that we cannot change the names ever, or we accept that downstream users will need to change their URLs. They have to change the URL anyway when a new release is made. Does it really matter if the URL changes more than just a version string? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
