2016-02-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:

> On 23/02/2016 09:12, sebb wrote:
> > On 23 February 2016 at 07:34, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> I'm confused. None of the other PMC members has expressed whether he or
> she
> >> want's the see Chimera/crypto joining Apache Commons, yet we're already
> >> discussing how JNI bindings should be handled.
> >>
> >> I'd like to see:
> >> 1) a clear statement whether Chimera/crypto should become part of Apache
> >> Commons. Do we need a vote for that?
> >
> > Yes, of course.
> >
> > However that decision clearly depends on at least some of the design
> > aspects of the code.
> > If it were written entirely in C or Fortran, it would not be a
> > suitable candidate.
> >
> >> 2) Discuss a plan on how to do that (I've described a possible plan [1])
> >> 3) After that is clear: discuss design details regarding the component.
> >
> > Some design details impact on the decision.
> >
> > Indeed even for pure Java code the code quality has a bearing on
> > whether Commons would/could want to take it.
> > Would we want a large code base with no unit-tests, no build
> > mechanism, and no comments?
>
> It depends. I care less about the quality of the code than I do about
> the community that comes with it / forms around it. A strong community
> can fix code issues. Great code can't save a weak community.
>
> How about creating a new sandbox component, let folks start work and see
> how the community develops?
>

I still have concerns about the IP, since this seems to be an Intel
codebase. I do not have the necessary experience to say what would be the
right way here. My gut feeling tells me, that we should go through the
incubator. WDYT?

Regards,
Benedikt


>
> Mark
>
>
> >
> >> Thanks! :-)
> >> Benedikt
> >>
> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/74j4el6bpfpt4evs
> >>
> >> 2016-02-23 3:03 GMT+01:00 Xu, Cheng A <cheng.a...@intel.com>:
> >>
> >>> At this point, it has just Java interfaces only.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Colin P. McCabe [mailto:cmcc...@apache.org]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:29 AM
> >>> To: Hadoop Common
> >>> Cc: Commons Developers List
> >>> Subject: Re: [crypto][chimera] Next steps
> >>>
> >>> I would highly recommend shading this library when it is used in
> >>> Hadoop and/or Spark, to prevent version skew problems between Hadoop
> >>> and Spark like we have had in the past.
> >>>
> >>> What is the strategy for handling JNI components?  I think at a
> >>> minimum, we should include the version number in the native library
> >>> name to avoid problems when deploying multiple versions of Chimera.
> >>> This is something that has been problematic in Hadoop with
> >>> libhadoop.so.
> >>>
> >>> Is this library going to have Scala interfaces as well as Java ones,
> >>> or just Java?
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>> Colin
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to discuss the next steps for moving the Chimera component to
> >>>> Apache Commons. So far, none of the other PMC members has expressed
> his
> >>> or
> >>>> her thoughts about this. If nobody brings up objections about moving
> the
> >>>> component to Apache Commons, I'm assuming lazy consensus about this.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the next steps would be:
> >>>> - decide on a name for the new component (my proposal was Apache
> Commons
> >>>> Crypto)
> >>>> - move code to an Apache repo (probably git?!)
> >>>> - request a Jira project
> >>>> - setup maven build
> >>>> - setup project website
> >>>> - work on an initial release under Apache Commons coordinates
> >>>>
> >>>> Anything missing?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Benedikt
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> http://home.apache.org/~britter/
> >>>> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> >>>> http://github.com/britter
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://home.apache.org/~britter/
> >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> >> http://github.com/britter
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://home.apache.org/~britter/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Reply via email to