On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any reason why you're not going with Apache Math - math.apache.org? > +1 Yang 2016-01-26 13:58 GMT+08:00 Chas Honton <c...@honton.org>: > Using the list from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Areas_of_mathematics, > the current commons math appears to be a sub-set of numerical analysis > algorithms. Is this correct? Will this continue be the focus of a math > tlp? > > Unfortunately, Apache Numerical Analysis does not trip off the tongue. > > Chas > > > On Jan 25, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Any reason why you're not going with Apache Math - math.apache.org? > > > > No one is going to wince if you have other language implementations in > the > > same project, and if it needs to break up over time because there is > Apache > > Math GroupTheory, Apache Math Fluid Dynamics etc etc; then more power to > > y'all. > > > > Hen > > > > > >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring, > >> descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't > >> be offended if others want to be more creative. > >> > >> My suggestion is > >> > >> MathComponents > >> > >> Hearkens back to HttpComponents, which has worked pretty well. > >> > >> Phil > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> >
