On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any reason why you're not going with Apache Math - math.apache.org?
>

+1!

Gary

>
> No one is going to wince if you have other language implementations in the
> same project, and if it needs to break up over time because there is Apache
> Math GroupTheory, Apache Math Fluid Dynamics etc etc; then more power to
> y'all.
>
> Hen
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Phil Steitz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > We need to agree on a name.  My own preference is for a boring,
> > descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't
> > be offended if others want to be more creative.
> >
> > My suggestion is
> >
> > MathComponents
> >
> > Hearkens back to HttpComponents, which has worked pretty well.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to