On 5 January 2016 at 20:42, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/5/16 1:24 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 5 January 2016 at 17:56, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/5/16 10:14 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>> An alternative approach might be to leave the POM as is, and create a
>>>> separate script to download the source/binary bundles from Nexus to
>>>> the dist/dev area, and then delete them from Nexus.
>>> Seems roundabout to me.
>> Is hacking the POM better?
>>
>>> As RM, I prefer to just commit artifacts
>>> that I have tested locally to svn, run a VOTE on exactly these
>>> artifacts and then just svn move them to release.
>> I'm not proposing changing where the VOTE files are staged.
>
> But how exactly do they get there?  Who does the commit?  What kind
> of script?  If it is a shell script, I already have those working
> fine locally (checked in for the components I have recently RM-ed).
> The only annoyance is getting rid of the junk in the Nexus staging
> thingy and playing with the GUI there to release to central.
>>
>>> Automating
>>> delete of Nexus cruft would be wonderful if there is a way to do
>>> it.
>> Nexus allows DELETE (with suitable auth creds)
>>
>> $ curl --user user:pass --request DELETE URL
>>
>> The URL is of the form:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachecommons-1120/content/commons-net/commons-net/3.4/
>
> Cool!  Can you add file specs at the end to specify the .asc.md5 and
> other cruft to selectively kill so you can just release what you
> want?

Sorry, I only copied the URL prefix from my script.
You need to add the filename to the end.

> Or do you have to kill the whole repo?

No. That would not be useful here ...

> Phil
>>
>>> I know some people don't like having to locally script the move
>>> of build artifacts into a local svn checkout of /dist/dev.  That
>>> could probably be scripted in maven somehow, like it is rigged for
>>> the site build.
>>> Phil
>>>> On 22 December 2015 at 08:39, Pascal Schumacher
>>>> <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks for the explanation and sorry for the noise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Pascal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 22.12.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
>>>>>> Le 22/12/2015 09:14, Pascal Schumacher a écrit :
>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I misunderstand the issue, but please continue to attach sources
>>>>>>> to maven central releases. It's very helpful when the IDE can
>>>>>>> automatically download the source of jar and display it.
>>>>>> This is already done.
>>>>>> There is a difference between the source distribution in the zip file
>>>>>> and the source jar. The former contains everything necessary to rebuild,
>>>>>> the second contains only the source for the sake of IDE auto-completion
>>>>>> and similar features.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What we are talking about here is removing the source and binary zip,
>>>>>> not the source and binary jar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best regards,
>>>>>> Luc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Pascal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 21.12.2015 um 23:24 schrieb Christopher:
>>>>>>>> Why detach them at all? Why not permit them to be uploaded to Maven
>>>>>>>> Central?
>>>>>>>> It may not be as useful for Java builds, but Maven repository isn't
>>>>>>>> designed to hold only jars. It can hold any type of artifact.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 20/12/2015 23:06, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've tested with JEXL and it seems to work
>>>>>>>>>> fine, I haven't noticed undesirable side effects.
>>>>>>>>> Actually there is one side effect: the .sha1 and .md5 files for the
>>>>>>>>> src/bin archives no longer come for free (they are currently generated
>>>>>>>>> when the archives are deployed in the local repository). So if we
>>>>>>>>> detach
>>>>>>>>> the files we should compensate with an explicit generation of the
>>>>>>>>> checksums using the antrun plugin immediately after the assembly
>>>>>>>>> plugin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Emmanuel Bourg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to