On 1/5/16 10:14 AM, sebb wrote: > An alternative approach might be to leave the POM as is, and create a > separate script to download the source/binary bundles from Nexus to > the dist/dev area, and then delete them from Nexus.
Seems roundabout to me. As RM, I prefer to just commit artifacts that I have tested locally to svn, run a VOTE on exactly these artifacts and then just svn move them to release. Automating delete of Nexus cruft would be wonderful if there is a way to do it. I know some people don't like having to locally script the move of build artifacts into a local svn checkout of /dist/dev. That could probably be scripted in maven somehow, like it is rigged for the site build. Phil > > On 22 December 2015 at 08:39, Pascal Schumacher > <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Thanks for the explanation and sorry for the noise. >> >> Cheers, >> Pascal >> >> >> Am 22.12.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Luc Maisonobe: >>> Le 22/12/2015 09:14, Pascal Schumacher a écrit : >>>> I agree. >>>> >>>> Maybe I misunderstand the issue, but please continue to attach sources >>>> to maven central releases. It's very helpful when the IDE can >>>> automatically download the source of jar and display it. >>> This is already done. >>> There is a difference between the source distribution in the zip file >>> and the source jar. The former contains everything necessary to rebuild, >>> the second contains only the source for the sake of IDE auto-completion >>> and similar features. >>> >>> What we are talking about here is removing the source and binary zip, >>> not the source and binary jar. >>> >>> best regards, >>> Luc >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Pascal >>>> >>>> Am 21.12.2015 um 23:24 schrieb Christopher: >>>>> Why detach them at all? Why not permit them to be uploaded to Maven >>>>> Central? >>>>> It may not be as useful for Java builds, but Maven repository isn't >>>>> designed to hold only jars. It can hold any type of artifact. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Le 20/12/2015 23:06, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've tested with JEXL and it seems to work >>>>>>> fine, I haven't noticed undesirable side effects. >>>>>> Actually there is one side effect: the .sha1 and .md5 files for the >>>>>> src/bin archives no longer come for free (they are currently generated >>>>>> when the archives are deployed in the local repository). So if we >>>>>> detach >>>>>> the files we should compensate with an explicit generation of the >>>>>> checksums using the antrun plugin immediately after the assembly >>>>>> plugin. >>>>>> >>>>>> Emmanuel Bourg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
